89%
year-over-year increase in attacks by AI-enabled adversaries (CrowdStrike 2026 Global Threat Report)
Hours to weeks
the manual investigation cycle a legacy stack imposes
2 weeks
the typical detection lifecycle from report to rule
SIEM · UEBA · SOAR automation · Threat hunting tooling · CDR · ITDR · Insider risk · AI D&R
EDR · Identity providers · Cloud platforms · Email security · Ticketing and chat
96%
of investigations resolved autonomously at Cursor
95%+
reduction in false positives at Canoe Intelligence
4,000+ hours
saved per month for an enterprise security team
Does transformation mean replacing the SIEM?
Not necessarily. Many teams start by running Artemis next to their SIEM and decide at renewal. 70% of Artemis customers have moved off their legacy SIEM onto Artemis.
How is Artemis priced?
On the size of your organization and the number of users, with no charge for ingest, queries, or AI usage.
How is this different from an "agentic SOC" from our platform vendor?
Platform vendors' AI agents usually depend on that vendor's own sensors and data platform, and AI usage is often metered on top. Artemis works across the tools you already run, on one model of your environment, and AI usage is not metered.
Does my team need to learn a new query language?
No. Ask in plain English. When an analyst wants to see or edit the query, the SQL behind every result is visible and editable.
What do we measure in the first 30 days?
Cases closed with a verdict, analyst time saved, detectors written for your environment, MITRE ATT&CK coverage by technique, insights surfaced, and findings your existing tools did not raise in the same window.
Is there a managed option?
Yes. AI MDR adds Artemis analysts who review your cases and respond within the limits you authorize.


